Don’t Hide Behind the Process

Well, it’s been a while since I’ve discussed process issues.  Time to dig in and have some fun!

Most of you that have followed my previous posts know that I’m a process kind of guy!  I’ve introduced formal lifecycle management into several organizations.  The teams that I’ve led have successfully utilized process enhancements to drive improvements in productivity, overall capacity and quality within various organizations large and small.  Utilization of a known process allows you to begin to measure various pieces of the lifecycle – looking for inefficiencies and issues that impact your overall ability to deliver for the organization.

Now all that said, each organization needs to find the lifecycle process and development paradigm that will work with their culture.  I’m not going to try and tell you what development paradigm you need to follow because I don’t know your organization.  Within the organization I currently work for we largely follow a waterfall process with some agile techniques utilized within various teams.  This works for us and the style of applications that we create/support – mostly technical interfaces within the payments industry.  Our overall lifecycle has various checkpoints/gating that we use to validate we are ready to move to the next stage.  This works for us!  We’ve significantly increased our productivity and capacity over the last decade and have improved the overall quality of applications that we are delivering to our production environment.

While all this has been good, I occasionally notice when people are hiding behind the process versus just getting the work done!  Not every project needs every step of the lifecycle.  Some are small enough and straight forward enough that we can skip various parts of the process or make the decision not to create some of the standard artifacts/documentation.

Decisions need to be made up front when the project is defined.  Those in the know, need to direct the teams when a project needs the full pomp and circumstance of the lifecycle and when the teams have the option to skinny up the process and skip parts of the lifecycle.  That means at the very earliest stages of Discovery, the Project Sponsor should be giving direction to the team on what the risks are associated with the project which can then drive decisions on how much of the process can or should be used on the project.

Additionally, once a project has been initiated, I think individual team members need to be cognizant of what is happening and make recommendations to the Project Manager if they feel certain pieces of the lifecycle could be skipped or maybe some documentation might not need to be created.  I’m not saying that we’ll always make the choice to skip over pieces of the lifecycle or to not create various pieces of documentation, but as leaders, we need to listen to the recommendations of the people closest to the work and if it makes sense, say yes!  When we decide that we can skinny up the process used within an individual project or that we can eliminate some of the standard documentation, those decisions should be documented.  That way, there is a record of the decision and the reason is documented and shared with the Project Sponsor.

Overall, we still need to deliver for the organization!  Delivering the requested solutions with the necessary features/functionality; delivering a solution at or below the expected budget; delivering a solution with the highest levels of quality.  Our teams should be held accountable to ensure we are delivering successful solutions at the end of the project.

If you'd like more information on my background: LinkedIn Profile

Picking your own Path!

I’ve been around the block for a while now.  Later this month I’ll turn 51 – which means I’ve seen all sorts of things during my career.  I’m lucky – I love what I do and I knew I wanted to be in software development very early in my life.  I touched my first keyboard when I was 12 and began programming in Basic on a DEC PDP 11/70.  And if that alone doesn’t date me, my first programs were created on punch cards and teletype terminals – yep a keyboard with green bar paper running through it that would physically type out the commands entered and responses would come back and print on the green bar paper.  The smartphone I have in my pocket has significantly more power than that first computer I used.  My Nana always used to joke that I was going to fry my brain working on those ‘computers’!

I also knew at a young age that I eventually wanted to be in management.  I had grown up watching my dad run various companies – some failed, others were successful.  While I was in high school, my dad started the final company that he would run – it became very successful and provided him with years of enjoyment until he retired several years back.  Exposure to these companies and the environment in which my brothers, sisters and I grew up in made me realize that at some point in my life I wanted to be in a leadership position – I wanted to run the world!  If I had only known then the growth I would need to be in the position that I hold today!

So why am I rambling on about my early career?  Well, at one point, I had several people attempt to convince me not to move from development into a management role.  I was reminded of this recently because someone that I’m acting as mentor to, is having the same experience.

Moving into management is tough for someone who is in a technical role.  I’m not saying it isn’t tough for other professions – it probably is.  That said, I’m speaking from the personal transition I went through.  I was used to being the one in control – at the end of the day, I could look back at the success I’d had that day pounding out the code.  I was good at what I did – I liked the tough technical problems and my managers relied on me to solve problems.  I absolutely enjoyed being a developer – it was fun, I got to solve problems, I got to play with new stuff that nobody had ever seen, I was recognized for being a person that could just get stuff done.

Eventually, I got to the point where I decided I wanted to transition into a management role.  As I began to tell people that management was something that I wanted to try.  I got feedback from all over the place that I should just stay where I was at, to eventually become a lead or an architect.  Many folks had an opinion to share and staying technical seemed to be the theme behind most of the comments.

Well, for me, it came down to what I wanted not what other people wanted for me!  This is important; you can’t let someone else determine your path forward.  If you know what you want to do with your career, then you have to make it happen.  You can blindly sit there and wait for someone to notice you and maybe give you the opportunity, or you can take proactive steps that will get you into the position you want to be in.

I recently sat down with someone who is contemplating making a similar move in their career.  We had previously discussed this “change” in their career and I know that the individual has communicated with their boss about finding a path between their current role and into a management role.  This individual than began to tell me of all the feedback they were getting from all over the place on why they should stay in the role that they are in.

I let this individual pour it all out on the table.  Then I asked them, "who cares what everyone else wants, when you look at yourself, what is it that you ultimately want to do with yourself?"  Now, I fully recognize that this individual is really good in their current role – and I mean really good.  That said, how happy are they going to be in the future if they at least didn't try?  This individual didn't hesitate, looked across the table and said, “I know I’m meant to be a manager!”  My reply, “Then why are you letting other people create doubts about what you can become?”

I have no doubt that this individual will experience some challenges moving out of the role they currently play and into a management role.  I also have no doubt that this individual will be successful in either role.  I also know the people this individual works for will provide the support needed to transition into the new role – they've done it with other folks on the team!

Sometimes you can’t listen to those around you and you need to chart your own course.  Don't be afraid to make a change and when you make the decision - proactively take steps to make it happen!

See more about my life in technology via: http://anidea4today.blogspot.com/

Practicing What We Preach …

This week, I got a small dose of humble pie from our CIO.  I was in his office discussing the difficult time that one of my teams was having filling a key position.  Finding someone is critical to the success of this team and it has been difficult finding candidates that would be able to come in, hit the ground running and make a difference.  We have key criteria for this position, and I’m not willing to budge – this is one of those times where I don’t have the luxury of training someone, I need someone with a specific skillset and experience.

Before everyone goes all crazy on me for speaking out both sides of my mouth, I normally utilize a very aggressive internship program to fill open positions within my team.  It is rare that I hire experienced candidates.  When I do, I am very specific about what I am looking for and I stick to my guns.  I won’t hire someone just for the convenience of filling the role, I will wait until I find a candidate who fits the needs that I have and that be a net positive for the team.  I’ve bent in the past when I felt I just needed to get a body in the door, and it’s a painful experience.

So, then, let’s get back to the story.  I’m sitting in-front of my boss – our CIO – explaining what steps I’ve taken and where we are at in the process.  He’s letting me vent and as we get close to wrapping up this part of the discussion he asks a simple question, ‘Have you considered hiring someone remote?’

Whack – right to the center of the forehead!  Ok, so you need to understand for the last several years, I’ve been the most vocal proponent inside the organization to allow our team members to work remotely.  We have successfully introduced it into my teams and this has slowly crept into a couple of other areas of the company.  This has been allowed in a very limited fashion, but has proved to be successful enough that a key member of our team moved to another state and organizationally, nobody questioned his ability to continue working for us when he asked if he could do so prior to moving.

Additionally, via an acquisition several years back, one of my teams is split geographically with the manager located at our main facility with half of his team and the other half all working in disparate locations across the southern US.

So there I am the biggest proponent of getting people to work remotely sitting there in front of my boss looking like a fool! Organizationally, we are ready to expand this program.  In fact our COO has recently spoken about the need to show flexibility in where our teams are located.

What could I say, but, ‘You’re right! I guess it’s time for me to step up to the plate and take the next step and push this program forward!’

As leaders within an organization, we have to remember the things that we are fighting for and when given the chance, we need to implement those changes into the organization.  Our bosses expect it of us and we expect it of the people that report up through us – we need to remember, the same rules apply to us.

If you'd like more information on my background: LinkedIn Profile

Dysfunction within the Team - Breaking down the barriers!

Sometimes I'm left surprised when an issue hits my desk and I begin to work backwards to find out what happened.  In too many instances, I can trace it back to follow-through.  Someone in the organization knew something, or was assigned to do something and for some reason forgot.  What's even more irritating is when I'm the guilty party!

Recently, I was rightfully called out by one of my peers for not communicating a decision impacting a critical project out through the organization.  She had every right to call me out on the lack of communication.  It was my error and I could do nothing but agree with her and acknowledge the failure.  I like to pride myself on the fact that have strong communication skills and working relationships with my peers, and so I take this one personally.  There are many excuses that I could use - I'm too busy as we move several key projects into production ahead of our year end production freeze; the Project Manager should have communicated that out to the team.  Ultimately, I made the decision and I had the responsibility to communicate the decision across the organization - especially when that decision was going to put pressure on other teams across the organization.

This is not unique to myself.  As I began to explore at the beginning of this post, too often I look at the root cause of an issue and it all goes back to someone knew and didn't think to share that knowledge.

I recognize that some of this is human nature.  In the heat of the moment, decisions will be made that we believe will move the process forward and get the entire organization closer to the end goal.  While that may be the case - follow-up is critical.  Let's face it, we've all sat on the receiving end of some decision that made our lives miserable.  We've had to deal with the fallout when that information comes at the last minute.  I will be the first one to step up and call someone out when they do that to myself or one of my teams - it's only fair that I take the feedback when I'm the one causing the problem.

To allow this type of honest feedback - you need to be willing to trust the teams you work with on a daily basis:

1. Your direct reports
2. Your peers within your supervisors team
3. Your peers across the organization with whom you deal with on a daily basis

One of the best books that I've read on this topic was written by Patrick Lencioni, "The Five Dysfunctions of a Team".

This book leads you through a scenario of how a group of individuals that didn't work or trust each other was transformed into a highly functional team.

I was first introduced to this book, by my current boss - our CIO.  It was the first thing that he wanted me to read after I was hired.  In fact, he sent it to me before I even officially started.  It is now one of my favorite books.  I in turn have required all of my direct reports to read the book.  I encourage my team to be honest with each other and to hold each other accountable in their daily interactions.

We have been hired for a purpose.  We are here to make a difference, to move the ball forward.  That means holding ourselves and others accountable for the deliverables that people throughout the organization rely on so that they can do their job.  We must open ourselves up to others, understand the story that is driving their actions and be prepared to receive open and honest feedback when we fail to live up to our commitments.

Don't get me wrong - this isn't a directive for you to walk around the building pointing fingers at people and telling them they're not doing the job - chances are if you did you'd have a line of people at your desk telling you that you didn't do your job.  What you should do is be willing to engage in a positive open communication.  Explain what you are seeing - you may not have a full understanding of the situation and be prepared to change the direction of the conversation based on what you hear.  If the person truly is responsible for failing to deliver, than it's up to you to find a positive way to work with the person and manage the situation.  Help them help you!

If you'd like more information on my background: LinkedIn Profile

I Wish I Knew Then, What I Know Now!

When I got my first professional job - it was selling IBM PC's and compatibles, along with the assignment of teaching a couple of courses for the company I worked for - these courses included dBase III and I believe Lotus 1-2-3 (that should give you a pretty good indication of how old I am). Yes, I had done contracting work prior to this job - some coding on the IBM 5110 - which was state of the art at the time. But that wasn't full time and I fit in the coding between school activities and my real job.

After a couple of years, I sought to find a job doing software development - I learned that although I could sell, I didn't like it. I also knew that I really enjoyed programming. So the switch was logical. Looking back on those first two jobs, I realize that although I thought I knew everything, in all honesty, I barely knew the basics. Following are some of the things that have been ingrained into my psych over the years – things maybe I knew, but didn't realize were important when I started my professional life:

1) Patience is a virtue. I've indicated in previous postings that I'm a Driver - with a capital D - learn more by reading about Social Styles. That's not a bad thing, it's not a good thing, it just is. My particular issue - one that I've learned to manage over the years - is that I want to dive in head first when I see a problem. What I've learned over the years, is that in many instances, you want to listen and ask before starting to solve a problem. In fact, I frequently tell my direct reports that when presenting me with a problem, they need to let me know: 1) they just need some room to vent; 2) they want my input on ideas on how to resolve the problem; or 3) they are escalating the issue and want my involvement. I had/have a nasty habit of jumping in on their conversation and telling them how to solve the problem. In many instances, they don't want me to solve it, they want me to guide them through the process and help them solve the issue (some might call this mentoring).

2) Be Passionate about your Role. I can honestly state that I've loved most every job that I've ever had. I've never left an organization because of the work - I've left organizations because of the culture and because of specific individuals. If you want to get ahead in your current role, you need to show passion, you need to let your boss know that you want to help him/her. Volunteer for the tough assignments! How many times have you walked up to your boss and asked if there was anything on their plate that you could help with? When an opening has occurred, have you ever told your boss that you’re willing to take on the responsibilities associated with the open position? Let your boss save money in the budget! I have and it's been awesome - I've taken on teams that were outside my prime area of expertise and it has forced me to learn. What's better than that? You win, your boss wins!

3) Learning is a never ending process. Especially in the technology industry. And, change is only accelerating. It wasn't long ago that you could use a language for years and not feel the pressure to learn a different language, now there are new scripting tools appearing daily. Businesses are shifting development paradigms!  You need to think about the user experience across mobile (phones and tablets) as well as traditional laptops and desktops. You don't need to run hardware anymore, you can develop, test and have your production environment in the cloud.  Companies are now introducing wearable technology - how do you think that will impact your business?

4) Communication, communication, communication! For those of us in the technology field, there is a certain personality that people associate us with - they believe we lack social skills and don't understand how to interact with others. I am lucky that my parents taught me how to communicate in groups at a young age. The fact that I can move between non-technical and technical users and communicate and share information has been a key driver in my career. The time has passed where you could hide at your desk and not have to interact with anyone. In the business environment that exists today, you need strong written and verbal communication skills. You also need to be adept and moving between technical and non-technical discussions and being able to translate information between teams.

5) If you're not happy, find something else to do! When you're dreading going into work every day, maybe you need to change things up. Once job from my past, made me extremely miserable. I didn't realize it in the moment, but after leaving the company and taking on another role, I was able to look back at the experience and understand how it had impacted me - and not for the better. It was a miserable experience for myself and others. I wasn't the only one who ended up leaving either. Over a period of time, a lot of good people ended up taking on different roles in other organizations. What a loss for that organization.

As I've grown into different roles and moved between organizations, these realities have allowed me to tackle new challenges.  Each of us have our own core strengths.  Figure out how to maximize the impact your strengths have within the role you currently play.

If you'd like more information on my background: LinkedIn Profile

Implementations - When Things Go Bump In The Night!

Sometimes bad things happen.  The question - how fast are you able to respond and put things back on track?

Technical teams need to plan and test their ability to rollback changes that are negatively impacting users.  This needs to be a formal part of your process - sometimes that means falling forward, fixing the broken functionality in production; sometimes that means falling back and reverting to a known state where the application was functioning properly.

Let's be honest - none of us are perfect all of the time.  Occasionally, we are going to miss something and move code into the production environment that ends up breaking things and making life miserable for the folks actually using the application.  

What have you done to prepare for this moment?

1. Does your implementation plan include steps to proactively monitor the system as changes are moved into production?
2. Does your implementation plan allow time for you to look at patterns of application activity to validate that you are not seeing patterns that would indicate that something is broken within the application?
3. Does your implementation plan include validation steps to ensure that the application is acting accordingly and that the new/changed functionality is working?
4. Does your implementation plan identify risk points and fallback strategies?
5. Have you tested your implementation plan?
6. Have you tested your fallback plan?

Every environment is different - but we mostly face the same types of challenges.  Breaking things that users expect to work is not what we want to do, but occasionally, it happens!

Yes, planning your implementations takes time.  Yes, planning validation steps and inserting them into the overall implementation plan takes additional time.  Yes, testing your implementation plan chews up more time.   And, yes, testing your fallback plan takes even more time.  That all being true, failing to do any of this means that your operating by the seat of your pants and your recovery time when things go bad will hurt you worse.

1. When your application fails - the reputation with your customers takes a hit.
2. The longer the outage increases the risk that your customers will walk away from you and begin to use a competing application?
3. Will an outage impact your revenue stream?

Now, all that said, sometimes even with all of the best planning, you're going to get caught.  It's bad enough when it's a web based application/service where you can make immediate changes or perform and immediate rollback.  However, what if it's software that you're sending out to customers - that they install on their systems?  How do you think Microsoft feels when they send out one of their regular patches only to find out that it causes the blue screen of death.  This can affect millions of computers around the globe.

Not to hit Microsoft too hard - but, in April they released a patch to Windows 8.1 that was required before any other updates could be applied.  This impacted retail customers as well as corporate customers and was not fixed until early May.  I'm sure that they ran their standard quality processes against the code prior to the initial release in April - but something obviously got by the testers, and it wasn't a minor issue.  It took time for Microsoft to hit the reset button, but in the meantime their customers were in an uproar.  

I'm going to walk softly here because as a developer it could happen to me or the teams that I lead.  I'm not trying to single out Microsoft - anyone that writes software has had to recover from a misstep when loading code into production or sending out a new release.  What I'm advocating for is that you implement solid processes that minimize the risk to your customers, your team and your organization.

What are you doing to mitigate the risk of an implementation/software release going bad?

Tags: Development; Programming; Programming Languages; Change; Decisions; Decision Making; Project Management; SDLC; Lifecycle;

For more information on David L. Collison: LinkedIn Profile

Languages, Languages, Languages ...

I speak regularly with High School and College level students promoting careers in technology - specifically careers with Applications Development, Quality Assurance and Project Management.  I enjoy interacting with the students and telling them what they may experience as they transition from the role of a student into the professional workforce.  Along the way, I also ask students to think about interning - either with my organization or some other organization in the area.  This is a fantastic opportunity for students to get real-world experience, become visible to an employer, and begin to understand some of the concepts taught in the classroom as they apply them to tasks in the workplace.

Many times, students ask me why we use the languages that we use and why we don't take advantage of the latest scripting or language fad.

My answer - why should I?  They seem to be stumped by my response.

Well, really, why should I?  Why should my team be disrupted on a regular basis just to use the latest language fad?  Why should I continually experience a productivity loss as team members shift between languages?  Why should I take the risk of bugs being introduced into production systems because the developers are not experienced with the language/tools that they are using?  Why should I risk customers being subjected to performance issues because the developers haven't figured out how to optimize the programs they're creating?  Why should I make the on-boarding experience for new developers more difficult?

Look, there are a handful of languages that we've committed to within our organization.  Four languages are used to generate all of our production level systems.  A couple of additional scripting languages have been used to create internal tools that assist us in production setup, as well as assisting us in ripping through logs to find specific information when we are researching issues in our environment.

Programming languages are programming languages - if you're a good programmer, you can pickup any language.  If you're a good developer, you understand that once you understand the various constructs of a language - learning a new language simply means translating the specific syntax of the language you want to learn to the languages you already understand.  It's translating how to use an if statement, a loop, a case statement, etc.  

Let's say it take you a month to become familiar with the new language - assume that your productivity drops by 50% and for 6 months after your initial learning period, you're running at only 75% productivity.  That means that over a 7 month period - you're productivity has cost the organization 8 weeks of development time.  Now multiply that across the entire team.  Assume their are 10 members on the team - that's a total of 80 weeks of lost development effort.  Assuming this same 10 member team and an average of 2 weeks vacation time for each team member - you have a total of 500 weeks that you can allocate to development efforts.  The end result is that you've stripped the team of 16% of the overall capacity of the team for the year.

Now, the numbers discussed above don't even take into account the impacts down the line as we move through test, implementation and post-implementation support.  How much more time will the Development Team need to create and execute unit tests?  How much time will the Development Team need to perform integration and regression testing?  How much time will the Development Team need to perform load testing?  How much extra time will the Quality Assurance Team need to test the application?  What additional issues will be experienced during the implementation of the code into production?  Can you quantify the number of additional issues that will be identified post-implementation that will need to be fixed and how much additional time it will take to address those issues?
 
The impact on productivity across the organization is significant and material - that is real time that prevents projects from being initiated or completed.  That's time that allows your competitors to either close the gap or get further ahead.

I don't mind taking on a new language when there is a need, or when there is a specific purpose.  Over the last couple of years, we've actually brought in specific tools that have allowed us to move in to the mobile market.  At this point, a select number of developers within the overall team have been exposed to these new tools.  Over time additional developers will be brought in to the loop.  Here, there is a specific need - our tools at the time did not lend themselves to creating cutting edge mobile apps.

Take a step back and look at the decisions being made within your organization.  There's usually a reason that organizations aren't moving as quickly from one language to another as developers would like.  To the developers that would like to get an organization to change - don't just go in and say that you need to be able to use a new language.  Document what you feel the benefits are, and just as importantly recognize the impact to the organization and craft your discussion points to address the costs that the organization will incur.


Tags: Development; Programming; Programming Languages; Change; Decisions; Decision Making;

For more information on David L. Collison: LinkedIn Profile